У меня тоже самое происходит. Пожалеешь организм, а он и рад - даёт попятную.На скоко я такое испытывал силовым будет пистец.
Может будет подругому, мы ж все разные. Но результата ждать долго - 6 недель.не думаю
по большому счету силовые как таковые меня мало волнуютПожалеешь организм, а он и рад - даёт попятную.
силовые упадутМожет будет подругому, мы ж все разные
Неплохо. Спина хорошая (важно, когда она спереди видна без позирования, как на первой фотке), она если есть, то её видно. Живот я бы не называл пивным, скорее - силовой. Очень удачно удалось избежать висячих боков (по мне так это очень сильный плюс).все так плохо, да?
Это точно))))бум работать
холоднуюфото сделаны в раскачке или на холодную?
то что у тебя хороший апетит я понял когда ты сказал что Томми Джеферс тебя тоже не впечатляетне совсем фонтан
к чему это было сказано?Слава Богу, что мои метания в поисках чудо метода оказались на удивление короткими и я бросил поиски и занялся тренировками.
Уже не помню точно как там было по контексту. Вроде как приводилось фото дядьки с подписью, мол один из величайших натуралов мира. А на фотографии был накаченный дядька но ничего сногсшибательного. Потом появилась сцылка на некую страничку и там уже тот же самый дядька более выгодно смотрелся. И я признал, что смотрится да хорошо. Или я по твоему должен Джонов, Томми и прочую братью в лицо знать. Так что коментарий был только к выложенному фото.то что у тебя хороший апетит я понял когда ты сказал что Томми Джеферс тебя тоже не впечатляет
Написал типа мысли вслух, потому как вижу, что якобы оптимальный тренинг вовсе даже не оптимален, а даже я бы сказал далёк от этого. А я чуть было не повёлся на научно-оптимальные суперукороченноэффективные программы. Вернее повёлся, да вовремя прозрел. А вот обьёмка искритикованая вдоль и поперёк, вернее даже не раскритикованая, а просто совершенно беспочвенно обосранная, приносит свои плоды.к чему это было сказано?
непонятно
нет конечноНеужто это уже повод для обид?
каждый понимает оптимальность тренинга по своему...якобы оптимальный тренинг вовсе даже не оптимален
кстати люди тренирующиеся под руководством Диско прогрессируютА вот обьёмка искритикованая вдоль и поперёк, вернее даже не раскритикованая, а просто совершенно беспочвенно обосранная, приносит свои плоды.
Quote
1. Say I have a bodybuilder trying to bring up chest and the focus of the day is on the clavicular portion. I'll start him with 4 sets of 6-8 on the incline bench, either straight weights or descending pyramid. Ok, now I want a second chest exercise to get some work for the sternal portion.
Strengthtaining guy sayz: isolation exercises are for fagz, do flat bench.
I say: Odds are this guy's triceps are trashed and he won't get much for HIS CHEST out of flat bench. Cable crossover, DB flye or pec deck for 3 sets of 10-12 is the more logical choice. At the next chest day when the focus is on sternal portion, I'll have him start with 4 sets of 6-8 flat bench and follow it with incline flye or incline crossover.
2. Say the same guy is trainin delts after chest and he can survive incline and flat bench. Now his triceps are really trashed. What do I have him do for medial delts.
Strengthtaining guy sayz: isolation exercises are for fagz, do military press.
I say: No, lateral raise makes more sense here, or upright row to involve biceps. Maybe upright row + lateral raises to get a comppound+isolation combination.
3. Say I have a guy who is just weak as hell overhead, bad leverages, his triceps fatigue mroe quickly than his delts, whatever the reason.
Strengthtaining guy sayz: isolation exercises are for fagz, shoulder press builds the delts.
I say: No, this guy is unlikely to ever get anything out of overhead pressing. If he has long arms, his delts may get the same (if not more) tension from Db lateral raise or a lateral raise mchine where the resistance is placed at the elbow.
Hell, even the WSBB guys do isolation stuff for their delts most days.
Remember kelly that, fundamentally, bodybuilding is about putting tension on the muscle, strength training is as much about training the nervous system as it is the musculature and a lot of strength training is about improving leverages to move more weight.
It's simplistically incorrect to assume that more weight = more tension on the muscle but that's incorrect.
Consider that, from the standpoing of the quads, a rock bottom high bar squat may put far more tension on the quads than a power squat, even if the high bar squat is many hundreds of pounds less weight on the bar. Why? Changing mechanics.
Say I dead pause a squat. This will limit my poundages by eliminating the SSC but may put more tension on my muscles trying to start it again.
Because of the long lever arm and isolation nature, a proerly done side raise may put more tension on the medial delts than any overhead press. It depends on the person, their biomechanics, etc.
Some more examples since you're probably still confused. Don't worry, I"ll use small words.
1. Say I have a guy who's fairly strong (by bodybuilder standards) who needs to bring up his quads.
Strengthtaining guy sayz: squats roolz, everything else droolz.
I say: Well, it depends. Let's say my guy is too strong to risk his joints doing low reps. So I may have him doing repeat sets of 15. Well, if he squats, we have two issues. The ifrst is that his low back may limit his ability to stress his legs which does not serve the goal of improving his quads. The second is that systemic fatigue from squatting will rapidly become an issue. What sense does it make to limit tension to his quads because he's gasping for air. Leg press makes more sense here.
2. Or what if the same guy tends to overbuild his glutes with full squatting or deadlifting and it's throwing off his symmetry?
Strengthtraining guy sayz: squat full or don't squat at all.
I say: well, i I want to emphasize his quads, a partial squat or leg press where I limit his rom (or even, gasp, a leg extension) allows me to target his quads without involving the glutes.
What if I've got someone in a hamstring emphasis cycle. He may start legs off with heavy SLDL and then some leg curls. how well is he going to squat after that? Not well at all. I may do leg extensions for maintenance work on quads even though strengthtraining guy says that isolation exercises are for fagz.
Lest we forget, bodybuilding is about apperance and there are considerations there that strength trainers don't have to worry about. Not just symmetry and the rest but stuff like maximizing sarcoplasmic hypertrophy (which may require the dreaded pump training at some point in the training cycle).
I could sit here and come up with dozens more examples, hopefully the above is understandable to your little brain.
Now, do I disagree with many of strengthtrainer guys general points? Not at all. As I said originally, some truisms, some gibberish in there. Should most bodybuilders focus on strength gains? Yes. Should they get rid of old school ascending pyramids. Yes, that stuff is stupid. Does that mean that they should all just train like PL's? No. But it's the attitude taken by strength training purists who can't see past their own asshole.
I've seen guys who were OL purists set upbodybuilding routines around the OL's. Why? Because they could'nt see past their own asshole either. They are just myopic assholes who can't realize that any training technique is just a tool with pros, cons and appropriate times to apply it. Apparently you are too.
They are distinct sports (with admittedly a lot of overlap) with distinct needs. Yo'ud have to be an idiot to think otherwise. And the kind of absolutist statemetns about isolation movmeents or certain types of training made by strengthtraining guy were simply moronic.
Lyle
0 пользователей, 1 гостей, 0 скрытых