15. How many sets and how to determine it
I suggest you do 2 sets per exercise during the 15s. Then do 2 sets during the first week of 10s,
and 1 set during the second week of 10s. Then do 2 sets during the first week of 5s, and finish
doing one set (after warm ups of course) during the last week of 5s. Always warm up first
regardless of how many work sets you are doing.
The volume isn't necessarily supposed to decrease each minicycle. It often does, simply as a
result of the increasing poundage’s and cumulative damage.
If you are doing HST properly you won't be able to just increase your volume at will. If you are
doing HST properly you should already be using as much volume as you can reasonably handle
and still feel healthy (no injuries etc).
HST builds strength sure enough, however, the actual manifestation of that strength depends on
the recovery of the CNS (and other neuromuscular factors) from workout to workout.
Sometimes a person will gain a little ground on their CNS recovery and their strength output
will go up. Those who zigzag are more likely to experience significant "strength" gains mid
cycle.
The size gains are dependant on what's happening to the tissue. This of course is dependant on
the absolute load as well as the relative condition of the tissue at the time.
So, should you increase, maintain or decrease "volume" as the cycle progresses? It depends! I
know how many people hate to hear that...but its true. Here is how you decide. Keep in mind
that these factors are to considered “collectively”, meaning each factor must be weighted, not
taken as an absolute indicator.
Increase volume if:
You are never sore
You are never tired
You are not growing
Maintain volume if:
You are slightly sore most of the time
You are tired enough to sleep well, but not so tired you lose motivation to train.
You are noticeably “fuller”
Decrease volume if:
You are experiencing over use pain, and strain symptoms in joints and/or muscles.
You are tired and irritable all the time, yet don’t sleep well.
Strength levels are significantly decreasing.
I said, “The number of Sets is determined by the minimum effective volume (this changes over
time according to current load and Conditioning.)" You said, “I thought ... that the expression
of the hypertrophic genes was increased in proportion to time under tension, i.e. 'more is better'
up to a rational point.”
If I understand correctly, you are concerned about the “minimum” effective volume part. Why
should a person adjust the # of sets according to the minimum effective volume if “more is
better”? Answer, because other factors such as Training Load and Training Frequency are
inversely related to training volume. In other words, the higher the volume of exercise, the
lower the Load and Frequency that can be effectively maintained over time. Likewise, the
lower the training volume, the higher the Training Load and Training Frequency that can be
effectively maintained.
It is just a matter of defining “minimum”. In this case, “minimum” means as many sets as you
can do without having to reduce the Load from set to set and the without having to reduce the
frequency beyond 48 hours.
Keep in mind that some signaling proteins are turned on by the combination of time and
tension, sometimes referred to as the “time-tension integral”, and others are turned on primarily
by the magnitude of tension without regard to time. Nevertheless, both signal-types will
respond with a flattened out bell curve. There is a point where the signaling response to the
stressor is at maximum. Further load and/or volume will not elicit a greater response.
So yes, there is "a point of growth/no growth". That point is determined by the Load, the
Volume, and the level of Conditioning of the tissue. To understand this we have to look at what
has to happen to the muscle during a workout in order to get it to grow.
In order of importance:
1) Satellite cells must be activated, differentiated, and fuse with existing fibers, donating their
nuclei.
2) Mechanical stress must be transmitted to the sarcolemma (mechanotransduction) and
contractile protein structures within the sarcomeres. This will trigger focal adhesion kinases
(FAK) that in turn initiate the downstream signaling events leading to an increase the
contractile and cytoskeletal protein expression/synthesis.
3) pH and oxidative stress must be acutely increased within the muscle fiber.
Focusing just on the workout, this pretty much sums it up. If #1 doesn’t happen, you will not
grow...ever. If number two doesn’t happen, you will grow a little, but you will soon reach the
limits of the sarcoplasmic/nuclear ratio and growth will stop. If #3 doesn’t happen, you will still
grow quite significantly, but the rate of growth might be enhanced or facilitated if #3 is
achieved.
#1 is achieved when a certain level of microtrauma is experienced by the fibers. This is brought
about by load, eccentric contractions, and to a much lesser extent, hypoxia (A.K.A. #3) When
load, eccentric contractions and #3 occur, each fiber will produce and release muscle specific-
IGF-1 (sometimes called mechano-growth factor) The IGF-1 in turn seeps out of leaky
sarcolemmas and acts on nescient satellite cells to initiate #1. Microtrauma is rapidly reduced
from workout to workout (Repeated bout effect) thereby limiting the effectiveness of any given
load to induce further hypertrophy.
#2 is achieved by loading a muscle that is actively contracting.
#3 is achieved by contracting a muscle (doing reps) until you create an oxygen deficit and
subsequent hypoxic byproducts (e.g. lactate and oxygen radicals).
The afore mentioned physiological principles of muscle growth are what we follow in order to
ensure that 1,2 and 3 happen.
1 set is not necessarily "better" than 3 sets.
As far as muscle hypertrophy is concerned, high duration of load is best. The cellular signals
that are initiated by strain on the structural and contractile proteins of the cell are increased as
time under load increases. If it weren't for the involvement of fatigue in performing the actual
reps and sets, you would be better off doing tons of sets and reps.
HST uses lower numbers of sets because the muscle is trained much more often. So, the muscle
isn't actually loaded for less time, its just that the loading is more evenly spread out over time to
keep the signal more constant. If there are any factors that allow a person to do more sets per
workout, he/she should do them.
From what other research there is on the time course of genetic expression in response to
overload, it is clear that we don’t even come close the amount of time needed to elicit the
greatest hypertrophic effect. But what are you going to do? We have to lift the weight a lower it
over and over in order to overload the muscle. From the overload research, I personally feel
longer time under tension is better. But you have to balance that with CNS fatigue, and absolute
load.
More sets with heavier weight is better than fewer sets with less weight. But there is a limit to
our exercise tolerance. So you have to figure out a way to get as much loading of the muscle as
you can, as often as you can, and still be able to constantly increase the load over time, without
burning out or getting injured.
Keep in mind that HST does not dictate that the total volume (i.e. number of sets per body part)
over the course of the week should be lower than what a person is accustomed to using with
traditional routines. HST only advises that the volume be evenly distributed over more
workouts in the same time period. So if you are used to doing 9 sets for back on "back day"
using a traditional routine (e.g. training each body part once per week), HST would have you
do 3 sets at a time for 3 different workouts.
Obviously, a guy who is used to doing something like 12 sets for back once per week, is not
going to gain much by dropping to doing only 1 set for back even if it is 3 times per week. He
went from 12 sets to 3 sets per week. Not only that, but HST would have him use submax
weights most of the time where he is obviously plateaued and used to doing 100% max weights
(Not true 100%, but 100% with the fatigue that inevitably accumulates by the 3rd set). This is
just too great a reduction in training to provide him with significant gains. The key here of
course is Strategic Deconditioning, which would then allow him to begin growing again, with
less "average" weight and volume, but higher frequency.
Well, for me, 2 sets is enough on most bodyparts. But then again, with body parts like back, I
will usually do 3 sets at different angles of pull and grip widths.
But the amount of volume each person is used to varies. I am not saying that you have to train
to your volume limit. I'm just saying that if 1 set isn't enough, do another. Do too much and
you'll begin to get progressively weaker, and/or injured and you will lose your desire to train.
At first, you won't know how much is too much and how much is too little. So, start with 1
work set per body part per exercise, and work up from there.
Sometimes, you will find that you need to do more during the lighter workouts, and fewer sets
during the heavier workouts. I hate to say this, but play it by ear, while you stick to the
principles. You have to learn what it feels like. You have to actually experience growth from a
series of workouts to be able to associate the specific feeling of "enough" work with subsequent
growth.
But just a hint, you will feel whether the set is a good one or not before you finish the set. You
will literally feel the strain of the weight on the muscle itself. You have to look past the effort
required to lift it, and try to feel the mechanical strain on the muscle. "Off the record" it is a
type of pain, kind of like the pain you feel when you stretch a muscle. Its mild, but it is in the
"belly" of the muscle. When your done with the set, the muscle will pump, and in the morning
you will be a little stiff in that bodypart. I hate to talk in such subjective terms like this but this
is where experience actually means a hill of beans.
Yes, you can damage a muscle to such a degree that it doesn't work properly 36-48 hours. The
thing is, this type of damage isn't necessary to get it to grow. In fact, you can get necrotic fibers
(dying fibers) if the damage is too severe. So too much of a good thing is a bad thing.
It isn't absolutely necessary to be able to "feel" this in the muscle. It is just a way of judging
something that is inherently hid from view.
Trial and error is just as good as "feeling it". If you get so sore that you can't move, you've
obviously overdone it. You will recover, but it isn't necessary to cause that much damage. The
serious damage is usually the result of too much too soon after a layoff. Too much burn won't
cause it. It is usually the result of super high volume when one is not accustomed to the weight
nor volume.
15.1. Time under load (TUL) - how much does it matter when loads
are increasing
People often make the mistake of overthinking this. It doesn't take much time for a given
(effective) load to trigger signals inside muscle cells to start growing. In a sufficiently
deconditioned muscle, only 1 set of 10-12 reps is sufficient to cause measurable anabolic
changes.
However, the more you train, the more resistant your muscle becomes to the training stimulus.
We've know this for years, and recently we have some good research to demonstrate it by
measuring signaling molecules in trained and untrained exercisers after a single bout.
So, the first solution to the problem of becoming resistant to the lifting stimulus is to create a
more potent stimulus by lifting more weight. You can do this until you reach your strength
limits.
Another solution is to lift the same amount of weight a bit longer by doing more sets and/or
reps. This works to a point, but soon (2-3 weeks) will fail to produce growth once again.
The problem arises when guys continue to increase volume because they are at their strength
limit. This begins to drain the CNS and recovery takes longer and longer. Eventually, they have
to rest so long between training each bodypart that they are unable to produce consistent
gains...the stimulus is just too infrequent.
I won’t go into just how deep the misinformation and misunderstanding runs in bodybuilding.
Suffice it to say, VERY few people who are serious about lifting understand how muscle grows
and how best to train for growth. They have some idea of course, but there is enough doubt in
their minds that they continually change their methods in hopes that it will work better.
Eventually, they will experience gains once in a while, but because they do not understand the
true cause and effect of those gains, they misattribute the gains to something else, usually
something coincidental to the period during which they made gains. This leads to all kinds of
false notions about what works and what doesn’t.
In HST, the reason volume tends to decrease as load increases, is to spare the CNS and allow
more frequent training. It has NOTHING to do with what people call periodization. If a
young guy can handle 2-3 sets during the 5’s, and still feel good for the next workout, go for it!
Unfortunately, most guys can’t do this, and they experience dramatic results nonetheless with 1
or 2 sets. The gains they might experience by doing one more set would most likely not be
noticeable as long as frequency is high, anyway.
I can't really tell you how you should feel after a set. If your muscle is resistant to growth, you
will have to do a little more to get it to grow, and hence, you will feel more tired. However, if
your muscle is sensitive to the training stimulus, you can do less and still grow and hence you
will not feel nearly as tired after an effective workout.
I would suggest that you try to do 2 sets during the 5s if you don't "feel" much from doing only
1 set. I do 2 sets on the basic movements and then I might throw in another exercise of 1 or 2
sets (depending on the muscle group) just to top things off.
Many people will also be stronger on the second set than on the first set of 5s. For this reason a
second set of the same exercise would also be recommended.